Happy New Year plus fourteen days give or take a few days. We don't really get much vitamins and minerals from dairy products, milk is suitable for baby calves. It's baby calf growth dairy, not human growth milk. In the event that you do your research you will discover out that our bodies really do not get much nutritional value from milk, not it's calcium mineral. We aren't baby calves just how can we get it's benefits? The thing we'll probably get from it is a big gut for a abdominal.
After looking carefully into the subject, and after some years' experience in its non-use, I can condition without hesitancy that, unlike the prevailing view, the flesh of family pets is not necessary as articles of food. … We shall find numerous articles of food, even as we study the matter, that, so far as body nourishing, building, and sustaining qualities are worried, contain double, and occasionally over twice, as much as any flesh food that may be mentioned.
Exhaustion could be an instantaneous sign of any vitamin B12 deficit. Humans do not naturally produce vitamin B12, so we should rely on canine products for our daily dosage. Cows and sheep have bacterias in their tummy to make B12 for these people. What's more, people are less able to absorb supplement B12 from foods as they get older. Experts recommend taking a vitamin B12 supplement, sprinkling just a little nutritional fungus on popcorn, or eating B12-fortified foods like soy dairy and vegan breakfast time cereal.
Says who? To begin with, correlation doesn't equivalent causation. Your argument about veganism being slower” could just as much go the other way - lions sleep 20 hours per day plus they eat a lot of organic beef. I work full-time in construction and I eat a vegan diet. Second, there are many vegan resources of saturated excessive fat, including coconut, chocolates, palm essential oil, and gasp totally hydrogenated natural oils. Third, a high-energy lifestyle requires extra energy and nutrients. Once you factor in the cost of food, the vegan diet (not fresh or organic and natural) provides this easily.
Also, my perception is the fact that diets that limit or avoid pet animal foods are motivated by a combo of three reasons: 1) concern for animal anguish 2) environmental harm from most meats production 3) health benefits from eating less meat or certain especially harmful meats. These reasons all give a benefit of some kind compared to the standard american diet, and the later two aren't considered here. From my experience, the issue of changing my diet to eating a lot less meat was trivial compared to the benefits it brought - especially nourishment knowledge and cooking experience. I eat canine foods sometimes now, but it's from sources that are in the boundary questions of dog ethics - non-sentient family pets (scallops), scavenged foods (freeganism), hunted meats, farm pets not explicitly increased for the purpose of meat ingestion, etc. Limited creature foods on occasion can provide the majority of the nutrition benefit, while averting the majority of the animal suffering.